Stratigraphic Modeling: review and outlook.

in: Proc. 26th Gocad Meeting, Nancy

Abstract

Over the last two decades, a significant research effort has concentrated on accurate modeling of stratigraphic layers and of the associated petrophysical properties. Stratigraphic grids and Geochronological Space (Geochron) both aim at finding a consistent way of describing heterogeneities by implicitly of explicitly defining a curvilinear coordinate system conform to the sedimentary layers. However, significant differences exist between these two models, both from the theoretical and the practical standpoints. In this paper, we discuss intuitively these differences with regard to geological realism and dynamic flow modeling. In particular, we show that Geochron generalizes over stratigraphic grids, opening the door to new and more accurate ways of modeling stratigraphic formations.

Download / Links

    BibTeX Reference

    @inproceedings{P02_Caumon,
     abstract = { Over the last two decades, a significant research effort has concentrated on accurate modeling
    of stratigraphic layers and of the associated petrophysical properties. Stratigraphic grids and Geochronological
    Space (Geochron) both aim at finding a consistent way of describing heterogeneities
    by implicitly of explicitly defining a curvilinear coordinate system conform to the sedimentary
    layers. However, significant differences exist between these two models, both from the theoretical
    and the practical standpoints. In this paper, we discuss intuitively these differences with regard to
    geological realism and dynamic flow modeling. In particular, we show that Geochron generalizes
    over stratigraphic grids, opening the door to new and more accurate ways of modeling stratigraphic
    formations. },
     author = { Caumon, Guillaume AND Mallet, Jean-Laurent },
     booktitle = { Proc. 26th Gocad Meeting, Nancy },
     title = { Stratigraphic Modeling: review and outlook. },
     year = { 2006 }
    }